Casino review
TrustDice
Own-test withdrawal on record, but regulatory or on-chain signals remain limited.
- Holds a Tier-2 jurisdiction licence — recognised regulator, lower enforcement bar.
- 1 Level-A own-test withdrawal on record (independent timing measurement).
- Licence number is operator-asserted only; we could not confirm it on a regulator-hosted registry.
- No Arkham-attributed payout wallet on file, or no observed on-chain payout activity.
Evidence on file
- Operator
- TrustDice
- Network
- USDT TRC20
- Amount tested
- 75.00 USDT
- Approval time
- (casino-side)
- Settlement time
- (on-chain)
- Total payout
- KYC
- KYC Full
- Network fee
- $1.79
- On-chain proof
-
b4c5…92a3verify on explorer → - Tested by
- PayoutDB Editorial Team
Per-network evidence
One row per network we track for this operator. Tier-A entries are first-party measured withdrawals. Tier-B entries are independently observed on-chain settlements from this operator's payout wallet — we did not run the test, but the settlement side is verifiable on the public block explorer. Networks with no evidence are listed for transparency.
Licenses and regulation
Audit dossier — TrustDice
Deterministic data block generated from our observation records. Each operator page renders a different summary because the underlying evidence differs — no two dossiers are identical.
What we observed
We have not observed any on-chain payouts attributed to TrustDice yet. Our brand promise is on-chain verifiable payout activity, so absence of data is itself a signal — see the verdict rationale below.
Compared with similar operators
Tier-B operators with the most recent on-chain payout activity.
| Operator | Tier | Payouts 30d | Networks | Latest seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrustDice this page | B | 0 | 5 | — |
| Roobet | B | 4532 | 7 | 17 Jul 2026 |
| Stake | B | 617 | 7 | 17 Jul 2026 |
| Duelbits | B | 1362 | 6 | 17 Jul 2026 |
Verdict rationale
We classify TrustDice as Tier-B — Caution advised.
- Some independent evidence supports this operator, but at least one key trust signal is missing or inconsistent.
- Licence is sub-Tier-1, meaning regulator enforcement is lighter. Read the licence section before signing up.
What would change this rating
Upgrade triggers
- At least 5 distinct on-chain payouts observed in the last 30 days (currently 0)
- A Tier-1 jurisdiction licence (UKGC, MGA, etc.) added
Downgrade triggers
- No on-chain payouts observed for 30+ days
- Licence registry check fails
- Unresolved payout complaints with matching wallet evidence
Withdrawal background reading
Concepts referenced across this TrustDice audit that PayoutDB explains in depth:
- Approval time vs settlement time — how casino-side review and on-chain confirmation contribute to total withdrawal time.
- KYC triggers at crypto casinos — when document verification applies and what gets requested.
- Evidence grading (A through E) — what PayoutDB's level-A own-tests prove and what other levels do not.
- USDT TRC20 vs ERC20 — network choice for TrustDice payouts and trade-offs in fee and settlement window.
- First-party tests vs observed evidence — the difference between PayoutDB's measured withdrawals and on-chain settlement observation.
- Withdrawal verification methodology — how the tests on this page were conducted.
- Casino withdrawal with no transaction hash — diagnostic when TrustDice or another operator shows no hash on a completed withdrawal.
- ERC20 confirmed but not received — diagnostic when an on-chain confirmation exists but the receiving wallet shows no balance change.