Fund a withdrawal test

Read this first. This page describes a planned funding model. There is no funding agreement in place yet. We are not accepting contributions at the moment, and we ask you not to send anything to addresses obtained from any channel that claims to be us. When the funding model goes live, the methodology changelog will record the date and the terms. Until then, this page is a public commitment to how the model will work, not an invitation to send funds.

The leaderboard tells you which operators are paying out on-chain. It does not tell you how long the operator takes to approve a withdrawal between user click and broadcast. That measurement requires a real test: a real account, a real deposit, a real withdrawal. We do not have budget for it at the moment.

That is the gap this page tries to close.

For an operator with a confirmed payout wallet on the leaderboard, a single first-party test produces:

• Approval time (operator side): measured from withdrawal click to on-chain broadcast.
• Settlement time (network side): block-to-block.
• Total time: end-to-end.
• KYC behaviour: whether KYC was requested, at what threshold, what documents.
• Network fee paid by the operator.
• A redacted transaction hash on the operator's review page that resolves to the explorer.

A test page is upgraded from audit-only (Level C, operator claim) to Level A (first-party measured). The verdict block recomputes. The operator becomes eligible for "On-chain verified" tier instead of "Caution advised" or "Watchlist", provided the licence and registry checks also line up.

Honest answer: this is a solo project, my budget is zero, and the smallest meaningful deposit at most crypto casinos is around 20 USDT after gas. To test the 20 operators currently in the catalogue once each, with the depositing-and-withdrawing round-trip, is several hundred dollars before counting network fees and time. I would rather publish the gap honestly than thin the savings.

Two options. Neither involves the site receiving custody of your funds.

Option A. Sponsor a specific operator test. You pay the deposit yourself at the operator (the standard signup, deposit, wager-minimum, withdrawal flow). You document each step with screenshots and the transaction hash. We turn your raw data into a Level B (third-party measured) test on the operator's review page, with credit to your handle if you want it. We provide the protocol document on request so you measure the four timestamps the same way every other test on the site is measured.

Option B. Underwrite a future test. Send a one-off contribution toward the test fund (BTC, USDT-ERC20, or USDT-TRC20). When the fund covers a full round-trip at a specific operator (deposit, minimum wager, withdrawal, network fees, plus 10% buffer for KYC delays), we run that test ourselves under the protocol. Contributors get an email when the resulting test page goes live.

Contribution wallet addresses are not on this page on purpose. They live behind an email confirmation to keep this page out of spam scrapers. Write to [email protected] and the addresses come back. No tiered confirmations, no commitment paperwork. You send what you choose, we tag it to a specific operator if you specified one.

• 100% of underwritten funds go to deposits, wagers, and KYC documents on the operator under test. Zero to operations, hosting, or my time.
• A full ledger of every dollar in and every dollar out, by transaction hash, on the changelog page.
• If a test fund cannot complete a round-trip for a specific operator (account closed, KYC failure, withdrawal rejected), the contribution is refunded to the source or reassigned to a different operator at the contributor's choice.

• A particular verdict outcome. The verdict math is deterministic. Funding a test does not buy a recommendation.
• A specific timeline. Tests run when the operator's signup process allows. Some require waiting periods, KYC document review, or wager minimums.
• Confidentiality about the test itself. Every funded test is disclosed on the resulting page as third-party-sponsored or first-party-self-funded, with the underwriter's chosen attribution.

Anyone claiming to represent this site on Telegram, Discord, or any social platform we have not explicitly listed in the About page is not us. The only legitimate funding contacts are the addresses returned from [email protected] after an email exchange.